Fusion music is dead in the West and what is being promoted under that
name is crude, commercial and soulless stuff, says Trilok Gurtu, one of
the earliest exponents of the genre.
"Fusion is dead in the West. Nobody cares for it there. World
music is upcoming, good remixes are welcomed," Gurtu told IANS
in an interview.
Gurtu, the Hamburg-based son of late legendary Thumri exponent Shobha
Gurtu, said the main reason for fusion's decline was that nobody wanted
to look out for genuine music.
"Nobody wants to spend money to go searching for good country
and folk music to bring out fusion. People who try fusion nowadays are
those who have no idea what is involved in fusion.
"What we have nowadays is Bhangra beats and Garba beats in the
name of fusion only because there is a large group of people from Punjab
and Gujarat in the West," said Gurtu, who is currently travelling
and performing in India.
"I am not being a fanatic but why doesn't anyone try something
based on Lavani of Maharashtra."
Gurtu, who demonstrated his talent with tabla at the age of six, is
also a master of Indian music, percussion and western drumming and plays
a unique hybrid east-west drum set-up.
While Jazz fans know Gurtu for his collaborations with Don Cherry,
John McLaughlin, Joe Zawinul and Pat Metheny, the US audience first
came to know about him as a member of Oregon, a world fusion or jazz
fusion band.
He is also a visionary composer whose musical adventurousness has led
him to creative fusions of Indian music with jazz, rock, classical and
ethnic music from all over the world.
What exactly is his music style?
"I have been doing it for 30-odd years. I think I would just call
it Trilok Gurtu's music.
"Everybody has a free hand to conceptualise what they feel about
my music. 'Fusion' and all are mere words.
"Sometimes it is naïve to categorise music as it is something
much more deeper. They cannot fit me in any slot as I fit into all the
slots," Gurtu asserted.
His music, however, could not reach masses and appealed only to aficionados.
"Though I was received on a high note by audiences -- musicians
loved my music, genuine music lovers loved it, the media did not carry
it well as it was not fashionable and so it did not connect with the
masses," he said.
"But today it (fusion) has clicked, it has become fashionable.
About five years after I started, people have come to recognise my kind
of music. By then I had moved far ahead."
Gurtu said that the fundamental difference between Western and Indian
classical music is in "the formula".
"There is a difference between the north Indian and Carnatic music.
While Hindustani is more elaborated and improvised, Carnatic's rhythm
system is the best compared to anywhere in the world.
"But where we lack (in Indian classical music) is the dance part
of it. We are stiff and lack emotional appeal.
"The geography is different. Our melody and rhythm structures
are strong, while we lack harmony. The vocal chord is the most important
musical instrument for us. I don't think it is for the West.
"We are the only country which has a formal language for rhythm."
Gurtu, whose debut album "Usfret" (1987) created a storm,
does not have much interest in Bollywood.
Despite being approached by stalwarts like Aparna Sen and Mira Nair,
Gurtu avoids composing music for cinema because he believes he cannot
deal with big networks and work styles of the Indian film industry.
"Some of Bollywood music is good though the rest is clichéd.
I like composers such as the Burmans, Madan Mohan and Salil Chowdhary,
while today A.R. Rahman is good."